What if the O2 and the pressure are not that high?
There are many who do this without harming themselves. Even athletes use it to heal wounds faster.
In Southern California, if you do biomeds. Hbot is high on the list ofSomeone posted a video of an autistic woman (funny lady) who said she enjoyed scuba diving. She found it very calming. Is the HBOT therapy similar to a dive experience?
[QUOTE=WIMomOf2]Thank you for the link bullet. This is the comment that caught my attention:
Comment from daedalus2u
Time: July 14, 2007, 11:43
Hyperbaric O2 is an absolutely certain way to trigger siezures, even in people who have never had a siezure in their life. Enough O2 at a high enough pressure will trigger a siezure with 100% certainty.[/QUOTE]
Of course, that is why with the hard chambers (where there is that chance) are monitored by a medical professional...so that this doesn't happen. As for the mild chambers....it doesn't happen, because the oxygen is not 100%. It really can be VERY beneficial for some (not all...nothing is beneficial to ALL when it comes to Autism).
Here is a link to my blog (if anyone is interested) in which I give updates on how my son is doing with mHBOT. There are also alot of links on there that will take you to sites explaining this therapy.
http://toyou-myamazingson.blogspot.com/
What is HBOT???Maybe Hyper-beric Oxygen Therapy??? Just my guess, I could be way offthis is what I just found on the subject...
I'm sorry, but ABSOLUTELY NOT! HBOT is an extremely dangerous procedure. I am going to link up to an earlier blog post by GTTO in which, in the comments section, someone recommends hyperbaric/HBOT and the reasons against it are given in the comments section.
http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=419#comments
I urge you strongly not to either consider, or if already doing so, proceed with the HBOT. This is one time when I cannot sit on the fence with my views.
Thank you for the link bullet. This is the comment that caught my attention:
Comment from daedalus2u
Time: July 14, 2007, 11:43
Hyperbaric O2 is an absolutely certain way to trigger siezures, even in people who have never had a siezure in their life. Enough O2 at a high enough pressure will trigger a siezure with 100% certainty.
Swechcha, you sound like a rational and reasonable individual. Thanks for posting of your success!
My daughter is adopted FROM India, and we suspect a birth injury is behind her ASD symptoms. I will be now be watching for research results using this technique, of which I had been more skeptical in the past.
Much of the controversy posted here was also informative, so it is a good thread to review.
Thanks again!
I do not want to be dragged into any controversy. For the nth time, my post is purely targeted at parents of kids with known brain injuries, like traumatic brain injury, asphyxia at birth, hemorrhages, birth complications such as seizures and so on. I know nothing at al about any other kind of profile. Also my suggestion is that if a kid has uncontrolled seizures, HBOT is not a good idea. In India, if your kid has seizures, they do not permit HBOT.My kid is on an anticonvulsant that completely controls his seizures. While in the chamber, he has never had a single seizure. All kids with brain injury are at risk for seizures. Even if your kid does not have seizures perhaps you should put him on an anticonvulsant before trying HBOT. That is up to a neurologist to decide.
Here is one other article, from my FAVE (and speculative!) journal ...
| Unique Identifier | 17141962 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rossignol DA. |
| Authors Full Name | Rossignol, Daniel A. |
| Institution | University of Virginia, Department of Family Medicine, P.O. Box 800729, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. dlross7@hotmail.com |
| Title | Hyperbaric oxygen therapy might improve certain pathophysiological findings in autism. |
| Source | Medical Hypotheses. 68(6):1208-27, 2007. |
| Abstract | Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder currently affecting as many as 1 out of 166 children in the United States. Numerous studies of autistic individuals have revealed evidence of cerebral hypoperfusion, neuroinflammation and gastrointestinal inflammation, immune dysregulation, oxidative stress, relative mitochondrial dysfunction, neurotransmitter abnormalities, impaired detoxification of toxins, dysbiosis, and impaired production of porphyrins. Many of these findings have been correlated with core autistic symptoms. For example, cerebral hypoperfusion in autistic children has been correlated with repetitive, self-stimulatory and stereotypical behaviors, and impairments in communication, sensory perception, and social interaction. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) might be able to improve each of these problems in autistic individuals. Specifically, HBOT has been used with clinical success in several cerebral hypoperfusion conditions and can compensate for decreased blood flow by increasing the oxygen content of plasma and body tissues. HBOT has been reported to possess strong anti-inflammatory properties and has been shown to improve immune function. There is evidence that oxidative stress can be reduced with HBOT through the upregulation of antioxidant enzymes. HBOT can also increase the function and production of mitochondria and improve neurotransmitter abnormalities. In addition, HBOT upregulates enzymes that can help with detoxification problems specifically found in autistic children. Dysbiosis is common in autistic children and HBOT can improve this. Impaired production of porphyrins in autistic children might affect the production of heme, and HBOT might help overcome the effects of this problem. Finally, HBOT has been shown to mobilize stem cells from the bone marrow to the systemic circulation. Recent studies in humans have shown that stem cells can enter the brain and form new neurons, astrocytes, and microglia. It is expected that amelioration of these underlying pathophysiological problems through the use of HBOT will lead to improvements in autistic symptoms. Several studies on the use of HBOT in autistic children are currently underway and early results are promising. |
| Publication Type | Journal Article. |
I haven't said anything, but I will. My dd has been involved in an NIH study for Hyperbaric Chambers (hard) for the past month. She needed to complete 20 hours which we finished on Thursday and then she had her end testing done by a local psychologist..ADOS and ADI-R on Friday. There are 20 kids involved in this particular study and only 1/2 are already done. First of all..my dd loves loves loves the chamber and the mask!!! I go in with her and we hang out..shadow puppets, drawing, watching DVD without sound because no electronics in the hard chamber. The NIH recommends 40 hours, so I am going to pay and try to work in 20 more hours. The psychologist couldn't put her finger on the improvement in all the kids. She said it was the unquantifiable stuff...the stuff you can't teach. My dd seems more mature, more "with-it". For many of the kids it enhanced their desire to socialize with other children, but my dd already enjoys other kids. I have not seen big wow's, but since dd loves it, it has the potential to help her with some expressive language/receptive language skills..I think that it is worth seeing it through to a more logical conclusion. We both have terminal congestion..it is allergies to the guinea pigs I suspect. We did have some trouble clearing our ears in the beginning;however, I started giving both of us decongestants before we went in and used earplanes and then she had no problem clearing (she actually has less problems than me). If you want research..start looking for the results of the NIH studies..I think ours is the last center, so there must be something out there. It isn't ABA because it isn't teaching, it is something else. It isn't a cure for autism, but if it helps with some troubling areas..why not.
Aloha, Renee
| Source | Medical Hypotheses. 68(6):1208-27, 2007. |
|---|
Not to be nit-picky, but some folks would say this is the research equivalent of the vanity press :) - lots of altmed folks publish there. It is indexed, though - give it that much. How about 'Pediatrics' or something like that?
Medical Hypotheses takes a deliberately different approach to peer review. Most contemporary practice tends to discriminate against radical ideas that conflict with current theory and practice. Medical Hypotheses will publish radical ideas, so long as they are coherent and clearly expressed. Furthermore, traditional peer review can oblige authors to distort their true views to satisfy referees, and so diminish authorial responsibility and accountability. In Medical Hypotheses, the authors' responsibility for the integrity, precision and accuracy of their work is paramount. The editor sees his role as a 'chooser', not a 'changer': choosing to publish what are judged to be the best papers from those submitted.
Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.
Authors are required to pay page charges. Details are given in the Guide for Authors
Again, sorry, but the use of words like "may" and "might" hardly justify the cost and risk of this type of "treatment."oh? You have a machine that lets you look into the future?
folks - agree to disagree. Somehow I doubt y'all are going to convert each other.[QUOTE=fred]| Source | Medical Hypotheses. 68(6):1208-27, 2007. |
|---|
Not to be nit-picky, but some folks would say this is the research equivalent of the vanity press :) - lots of altmed folks publish there. It is indexed, though - give it that much. How about 'Pediatrics' or something like that?
[/QUOTE]
Fred, NOTHING else. I went into Medline and those two are ALL THERE IS, to date.
Which was my point in posting, actually ... AND ... of course, ANYTHING named Medical Hypotheses is a highly creative, outer limits kinda journal ... I would not call it VANITY so much as an outlet for speculation. There is a place for that too.
I used the word "may" because I don't know the future. If you haven't done the therapy..how do you know that it will help????? HBOT has helped her so far, but we haven't done all the recommended hours. ABA doesn't help ALL kids. IF you are sick and take an antibiotic..it MAY help, but what if it the bug is drug resistant or you are allergic to the antibiotic??? I am sorry, but I have never felt unsafe doing HBOT and my dd has had nothing but positive things to say about the experience. I guess that is why you raise your child your way Peaches and I raise my child my way.nene -- it is exciting it worked for you -- and I am looking forward to what gets published![QUOTE=foxl][QUOTE=fred]| Source | Medical Hypotheses. 68(6):1208-27, 2007. |
|---|
Not to be nit-picky, but some folks would say this is the research equivalent of the vanity press :) - lots of altmed folks publish there. It is indexed, though - give it that much. How about 'Pediatrics' or something like that?
[/QUOTE]
Fred, NOTHING else. I went into Medline and those two are ALL THERE IS, to date.
Which was my point in posting, actually ... AND ... of course, ANYTHING named Medical Hypotheses is a highly creative, outer limits kinda journal ... I would not call it VANITY so much as an outlet for speculation. There is a place for that too.
[/QUOTE]
Absolutely - but... Do you think alt med. practictioners and special interest groups should be using publication in journals like this to enhance their aura of credibility with the lay public (of which I am a member)?
ERRRhm, Fred, I do not think it DOES enhance their aura of credibility!
But, maybe I have read this stuff for too many years???
I guess now the public has direct access via pubmed, you may be right ... but then, there is a lot else out there that according to MDs I know, does NOT have any direct clinical clinical relevance or applicability ... kind of like how DSM-IV describes autism, and how we parents recognize it? You get a lot of publications that have nothing to do with what is being done, clinically, and a lot of clinical knowledge, that never gets published. It is interesting, once you have the interface between clinicians and literature!
beautiful - I never thought of it that way, Linda. I always thought of it as a place where anything could get published, so that alt.med practioners could claim journal articles supporting their clinical practice :) [QUOTE=momtoMatthew]oh? You have a machine that lets you look into the future?
[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=fred]beautiful - I never thought of it that way, Linda. I always thought of it as a place where anything could get published, so that alt.med practioners could claim journal articles supporting their clinical practice :) [/QUOTE]
It took a clinician to point it out to ME!
Oh yes, I'm absolutely
BTW: I will keep doing mHBOT with my son, since it definitely does work for him
adios [QUOTE=momtoMatthew]
Oh yes, I'm absolutely
with jealousy!
BTW: I will keep doing mHBOT with my son, since it definitely does work for him
adios
well, thanks you guys I was going to start a post about this tonight, but it is all done for me. I have just been wondering about it lately and like everything else on our world it is different for eveyone. well see what i can do.....
This looks like it is turning into roller derby.swechcha, how did you decide your baby is at risk of autism?I have to apologize. I tried to move this entire topic to Alternative Treatments but managed to only move the first two posts -- each to two different locations! Sorry. I'm just learning to be a mod. I have a question in to the admin about how to undo it. Hopefully, this entire topic will eventually appear under HBOT in Alternative Treatments.Dear Sweecha
I hv 5 year old son with autism,in india which city is providing HBOT for child with autism other than Delhi?Pls let me know want to do it for my son..
thanks
sangeeta
I have to jump in here. About 2 years ago we decided to research HBOT. Then along with our pediatrician and psychiarist (and I am also a BCBA) we read the research and discussed and debated for a year regarding whether or not to do it. We elected to go ahead and do it under the supervision of a doctor and we purchased the home unit (,000). We also had a researcher from a local university who works with kiddos with autism do pre and post testing of my son. IN EVERY ASSESSMENT THAT WAS DONE HE GAINED BETWEEN 6 MONTHS AND 2 YEARS!!!! We are in the process of completing the data analysis to have the study published. My son has made AMAZING gains in speech and processing (in particular). We did not go into it lightly, and did an incredible amount of research before starting. We do feel we made the best choice for our son and he is making gains because of it.
WOW there is no way we could afford that. I would be very curious though if it would be good for my sons. I have always suspected we are dealing with asphyxia at birth, prematurity and a traumatic birth, maybe something akin to mini strokes on the brain at birth, not so much autism. No brain damage showed up on the MRI though. Hum, very interesting though. Sounds like it really helped some, but that is a lot of money for no guarantees.
We couldn't either however dh has an uncle who is a millionaire (really) and he just turned 100. He has no family besides us and believes in things like HBOT as it is more natural of a treatment in his view....he bought it for us. We are very blessed!Oh I am so happy that you are having success...does your rich uncle want to adopt anymore families