| Back to Autism Information >> Next Topic | |||||
Right now there seems to be very little scientific evidence on what characteristics predict future success. However, since parents naturally wonder what the future holds for their child, I've gathered a few online resources on prognosis. Note: web addresses somehow get blank spaces added into them, so if the link doesn't work, try deleting the blank spaces. If it still doesn't work, let me know and I can fix it. 1) http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/105/5 /e65 - In this article, Dr. James Coplan presents a conceptual model, based on 2 decades of clinical experience, that he has found useful when introducing parents to the diagnosis of ASD and making preliminary statements about prognosis. 2) Article by James D. McDonald, originally posted on this forum by Daddy. See separate post under this topic. 3) http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/dh6qbh4k3cw76bnr/ - Abstract of a study involving joint attention and imitative ability. I've posted this abstract in an easier to read format under a separate post under this topic. Any other resources to add? Here's the article by James D. McDonald, originally posted to this forum by Daddy. <quote> Q: What are early signs that my child will become more social and communicative and act less in autistic ways? (Even if diagnosed autistic) Over 30 years of clinical research shows that young children, who show the following behaviors, tend to become more social and communicative and show less and less autistic features. Consequently, I strongly recommend you to ask whether your child shows some of these and that they become your first goals before you focus on language, academics (school) or compliance training. Note that many of these are the positive sides to the defining features of autism. (See DSM IV) Your big job is to help your child do more of what he can do and not focus on what he cannot now do easily. Score each as follows: 1=Never or rarely, 2= Occasionally, 3= <unquote> Source: an article by James D. MacDonald. Read more by this author at www.jamesdmacdonald.org Here's the abstract on joint attention and imitating as signs of a good prognosis. I added paragraph marks and notes to make it easier to read. <Quote> Joint attention abilities play a crucial role in the development of autism. Impairments in joint attention are among the earliest signs of the disorder and joint attention skills relate to outcome, both in the 'natural course' of autism and through being targeted in early intervention programmes. In the current study, concurrent and longitudinal associations between joint attention and other social communication abilities measured in a sample of infants with autism and related pervasive developmental disorders at age 20 months, and language and symptom severity at age 42 months, were examined. Extending the findings from previous studies, joint attention ability was positively associated with language gains and (lower) social and communication symptoms, and imitation ability was also positively associated with later language [Norway Mom's interpretation: those who could imitate were more likely to acquire language, those who couldn't were more likely to be nonverbal] Some specificity in the association between different aspects of joint attention behaviours and outcome was found: declarative, triadic gaze switching predicted language and symptom severity but imperative, dyadic eye contact behaviours did not. [Norway Mom notes: I'm assuming that diadic is between adult and child, triadic is between adult, child and object; declarative is for communication, imperative is "gimme".] Further, although joint attention was associated with later social and language symptoms it was unrelated to repetitive and stereotyped symptoms, suggesting the latter may have a separate developmental trajectory. Possible deficits in psychological and neurological processes that might underlie the impaired development of joint attention in autism are discussed. <unquote> Source: http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/dh6qbh4k3cw76bnr/ Those a great. Very interesting. Thank you. On the second one (McDonald), did it give any ranges for the scores? I wonder what is "higher"? Just wondering.I'm afraid I don't have the scoring guide for the McDonald checklist -- there might not even be one.
Thanks Norway:) Personally all the professionals I have talked to...they are so vague when I ask them what the future holds..it makes me wonder if they truely follow the childs progress at all once they get diagnosed? The best I have heard from them is "she will learn skills" I love to hear success stories of the adults with ASD on board that beat the odds against all predictaments and are surviving...that keeps me going:) Saved your link for later reading:) Too many words:P Shelley...us too...everyone is so vague in what our son's future holds...with the exception of one doctor that felt she needed to tell us Mason would never be able to count change, much less live on his own. But I did ask! Thanks NorwayMom...your info is so helpful...I'm starting to get dependent on you, though, lol...rather than looking up the info myself...but please, please, don't stop!! Norway Mom -- You are the BEST when it comes to posting great articles! I LOVE the first, in particular. How many HOURS a day do you spend tracking these things down??? You are such a wonderful resource on this Board. Thanks.I usually have my mornings free, so I do spend quite a bit of time on things related to this forum. However, these particular things fell into my lap. I just decided recently to gather them in one place so they'd be easy to find. I'm glad other people find it helpful. [QUOTE=Faithishope] On the second one (McDonald), did it give any ranges for the scores? I wonder what is "higher"? [/QUOTE] Faithishope, the way I was figuring it after I did this checklist for Skylar( don't know if the way I figured was right...) but there are a total of 18 questions, the highest score for each question being 3, so I would figure for this one to have a total score of 54 at the highest and 18 at the lowest. But that is just My opinion ![]() But then again, I could be WAY off on this. MandyAnthony- Your rating scale makes sense to me. The score I got was right in the middle. Norway mom you are the best! I save alot of your posts but Im sure Ive missed alot of them but im going to do a search then save and burn them all ![]() I can always count on you to have a link or two on just about everything. You and your links have helped me so much in the last few months. I feel like I owe you my life sometimes. I feel that I have become more knowledgeable on my son's disabilities through most of the links I have used of yours and I thank you!!! Nikki, I hope I was right in figuring that rating scale. I feel pretty confident that I was, seems to make sense, especially knowing my son the way I do, and using that checklist only validated what I knew already, and it was right on with him.
3) Dr. Fein published a report in 2005 (J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2005;35:525-34) where 11 children with ASD ended up at age 6-7 with clear-cut ADHD with mild residual features of autism, "such as social awkwardness (but more impulsive and immature than aloof), perseverative interests, and occasional mild motor stereotypies." There are three possible explanations for this: ... Maybe these kids had both ASD and ADHD all along. ... Maybe they had a severe subtype of ADHD that presents as autism in early childhood. ... Maybe attentional impairment is the most stubborn feature of ASD, and remains when social, behavioral and communication problems subside. 4) In an ongoing study by Dr. Fein, she looked at 77 children who screened positive on the M-CHAT at age 2 and were seen again at age 4. Of the 16 who screened positive for reasons other than autism, none of them had autism at age 4 either. Of the 61 who screened positive on the M-CHAT because of autism, 15 had moved off the spectrum. The only difference between those who moved off the spectrum and those who remained were significantly higher motor skills (!). Otherwise, communication, socialization, symptom severity and cognitive ability were the same at age 2. Yet the recovered sub-group reached "almost normal levels" on all those measures at age 4. 5) In another study (not yet published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders when the article was written), Dr. Fein looked at 14 kids who had been diagnosed with ASD in the past, but were of normal intelligence and functioning at peer-level in mainstream classes. These high-functioning kids had normal performance on many measures, including different aspects of linguistic ability, expressive vocabulary, and sentence memory, and had adaptive skills in communication and socialization. During the first evaluation, when this group of kids fell between ages 5 and 9, they had some limited impairments: ... trouble reasoning about animate objects (not including people). ... trouble producing good narratives, leaving out major events and characters' motivations. ... trouble with "second order theory of mind" situations, such as knowing "what does Johnny know that Suzie knows about what Rick thinks." ... trouble knowing the difference between mental state verbs (know, guess, estimate) At follow-up visits when the group was 9-12 years of age, the only impairment left was the last item, mental state verbs! Why are some able to recover? Fein doesn't think misdiagnosis is likely, at least not for the kids in her own studies. It is a special combination of intervention and personal characteristics? Or is it a subtype of autism, perhaps one with minimal structural brain abnormalities? Do the recovered kids do tasks using the same brain systems as NT kids? Norway Mom- I can not thank you enough for the posting of the research you do. It's almost like having a personal research asst. Everyday I find out something I didn't previously know about autism I count as a good day. ttfn |
|||||
|
Copyright Autism-PDD.net
|